Block Party is over
Posted by Trixter on April 6, 2008
…and I just arrived back home, and will promptly crash. I will write a more detailed report with a few pictures tomorrow or Tuesday.
Oldskooler Ramblings
the unlikely child born of the home computer wars
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
TrixterTwitter
- @iznaut @itstheshadsy @yozetty Something you and @danagould may have in common 3 days ago
- @jerware Google is too big to react quickly these days. 3 days ago
- @br I have many set up, but they're workhorses in a work area; none are set up just for show. I'm not sure I could… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 days ago
- 30+ years following the #demoscene, and I have to admit that CTRL-ALT-ELITE is probably my favorite group name ever… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 days ago
Pages
Meta
Top Posts
- Gone Home's horrifying alternate ending
- 8088 MPH: We Break All Your Emulators
- The first 256-color game on the IBM PC
- My IBM PCjr Print Media Archival Project
- 8088 Domination Post-Mortem, Part 1
- How to reasonably archive color magazines to PDF
- The semantics of discourse
- 8088 Domination Post-Mortem, Conclusion
- Access Software's Echelon
- Stone Age Multimedia: Corruption
Archives
- December 2022
- April 2022
- December 2021
- April 2021
- October 2020
- July 2020
- October 2019
- September 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- October 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- July 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Blog Stats
- 845,591 pageviews
Blogroll
Oldskooler Ramblings 
Steeve said
This actually WAS tebrrily clever. Well, it still IS tebrrily clever.There was no way for IBM and Commodore machines to really share floppies, since the recording technology was so completely different on the two machines.The essence of this hack is realizing that DOS keeps the basic info about the disk on the first track, while Commodore keeps the data in track 18. So, track 18 tells the Commodore to only use the track that held Commodore data, and that the rest of the disk was not used. The IBM information, however, marked every Commodore track as bad, so they would never used. In essence, this kept two entirely separate file systems living on the same disk.I like this. It is quite completely and utterly cool